Public Pools Must Be Handicap Accessible or Risk Fines
Save Email Print
Bookmark and Share
Updated: 6:35 PM Feb 2, 2012
Public Pools Must Be Handicap Accessible or Risk Fines
With a new American Disabilities Association law taking effect March 15, 2012, many public pool owners have a little over a month to ensure their pools are handicap accessible or risk paying thousands in fines.
Posted: 6:00 PM Feb 1, 2012
Reporter: Kavontae Smalls
Email Address: kavontae.smalls@wjhg.com

Pool Lift Law
Font Size:

Panama City Beach -- Swimming is the third most popular sport behind walking and gym workouts. Starting March 15, 2012 some people may be enjoying swimming pools more often.

“The disabled and handicap people should be able to enjoy a pool just like you and I do, so I think it is great” said Barbara Gudgel, Cox Pools.

The American Disability Association compliance law requires all public swimming pools in the United States to be equipped with assisted entry systems. Most all the public and municipal facilities have to comply. Those less than 300 linear feet must have either a chair lift or a sloped entry. Larger pools must have more than one entry method that is handicapped accessible. Alternatives to a pool lift include a zero entry slope, but installing one can be costly to an existing pool.

“If you have an existing pool, the most economical way and easiest way would be to get a chair lift” said Gudgel.

Chair lifts can run about $3,000 dollars and up. Government tax rebates can reduce that cost, but failure to comply could mean a fine up to $100,000 dollars. Hotel pools must be handicap accessible because of its short-term occupancy, but the law may not apply to all condos that rent long-term.

“There are some condos that can be excluded, and it has to do with the rental if the condominium has rental properties or not” said Gudgel.

Cox Pools is holding a public ADA compliance meeting.

When: Thursday, February 9, 2012 10:00am and 11:00am.
Where: Comfort Suites, 225 Richard Jackson Blvd, Panama City Beach, FL 32427


Latest Comments

Posted by: Carol on Feb 2, 2012 at 01:36 PM

Thank you for your insightful comment. Being born differently as you put it, I commend you on realizing that such an enactmet would force all establishments big and small to endure an expense that is just not financially feasible in this tight economy. I also thought that it was definitely in poor judgment to have a spokesman from a local pool company who stands to profit endorsing this new questionable "law".
Posted by: Jan Location: PC on Feb 2, 2012 at 04:33 AM

I'm Just Saying, If everyone at the table of life is dealt a different hand of cards from the same deck, who at the government or in society decides everyone gets a Royal Flush. I was born differently, with different abilities than most everyone else who reads this, but forcing public pool owners to refit their pools at a cost of 3k and up or risk enormous fines if going overboard. Ms Gudgel thinks this is a good idea, speaking for a company who stands to make a profit off this venture is very happy with this deal. Leave this decision up to the pool owners and handicapped. If a pool owner does not want to put in a ramp or lift, then the handicapped can choose not to visit, or do business with the establishment. The Government needs to Stay Out of It.
Posted by: Brian Location: Panama City on Feb 1, 2012 at 09:20 PM

Per the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the Federal government has absolutely zero authority to enact any law concerning pools on non-Federal property. None. This is a State issue at most. This law at the Federal level is null and void...and any prosecutor and judge forcing compliance should be put in jail.
Headlines - msnbc.com